Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake latency update
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:52:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9E1A43-0182-4A1F-8262-6F587A79254E@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459B9F17-317F-465E-8D2F-361CF47E5F32@gmail.com>


> On 9 Feb, 2017, at 18:36, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m seeing good latency results for Cake at lower MCS levels (graphs below), in case that wasn’t already known.

Yes - despite its complexity, Cake has always performed well on latency in comparison to other qdiscs.

I gather this time you’re comparing it against the mac80211 fq_codel, rather than a conventional qdisc stack?

 - Jonathan Morton


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-09 16:36 Pete Heist
2017-02-09 20:52 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2017-02-10  8:04   ` Pete Heist
2017-02-10  8:49     ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-10  9:21       ` Pete Heist
2017-02-10  9:29         ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-10 10:05           ` Pete Heist
2017-02-10 10:31             ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-10 11:08               ` Pete Heist
2017-02-10 11:35                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-02-10 12:21                   ` Pete Heist
2017-02-12 12:43                     ` Pete Heist
2017-02-12 13:08                       ` Dave Taht
2017-02-12 14:12                         ` Pete Heist
2017-02-12 16:37                           ` Pete Heist
2017-02-12 16:41                           ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-12 17:15                             ` Pete Heist
2017-02-14 10:02                               ` Pete Heist

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D9E1A43-0182-4A1F-8262-6F587A79254E@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=peteheist@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox