From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dan@coverfire.com>
Received: from alpha.coverfire.com (alpha.coverfire.com [69.41.199.58])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85EE73B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:07:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neptune.home (pkt.206.174.packetworks.net [206.174.180.53] (may
 be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
 by alpha.coverfire.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w6QI7Z0u014338
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:07:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=coverfire.com;
 s=alpha2011102501; t=1532628455;
 bh=+6A88ZUCTNbjfSc/2uQg5jwzH3F12daHqFievUEc3qY=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=Xm/ppj8jWghqOmAOCoHEiGiQio7dkBeDprW3l8jiPmvabmyoO+/XovLQdGFlcRVCZ
 gzP1NEoVjxQFsx+xcVKlWemo8VK7FzZUhB40LxPQYa6IMzcjpxqqmGlboptGypHtih
 oxiw2B5JQHriaiC1MejFg6CUcEmh+8ghrNGUz9T0=
Message-ID: <3ab0c2e8d33a71ca58a404a6a8b293a95fe1e9d3.camel@coverfire.com>
From: Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:07:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw78WaNw=M7E=JfTw6F80rogHCaXNzkn9-W6x4GcqwDjvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1357421162.31089.1531812291583@webmail.strato.de>
 <CAA93jw6xh4rquGA+hSOKjLB_SYObe8p2+-aw_0+wk2YshWiUgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1c323544b3076c0ab31b887d6113f25f572e41ae.camel@coverfire.com>
 <CAA93jw78WaNw=M7E=JfTw6F80rogHCaXNzkn9-W6x4GcqwDjvg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.4 (3.28.4-1.fc28) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 69.41.199.58
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU
 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on alpha.coverfire.com
Subject: Re: [Cake]
	=?utf-8?q?Using_cake_to_shape_1000=E2=80=99s_of_users=2E?=
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:07:37 -0000

On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 08:48 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 8:46 AM Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Tiny bit of self promotion here but Preseem (
> > https://www.preseem.com)
> > is a transparent bridge that leverages HTB/FQ-CoDel to make
> > subscriber plan enforcement provide much better QoE. Leaving
> > enforcement up to the deep queues in most network equipment has
> > comparably very bad results. We focus on WISPs but we have
> > customers that provide service via DSL and cable as well.
> 
> AWESOME. I am curious as to how high you can scale currently?
> (subscribers, bandwidths)

Since our boxes are low cost, we tend towards slightly more distributed
deployments with smaller boxes.

However, a i7-7700 w/ X710 NICs can do about 4Gb/sec with 4000
subscribers with ~25% CPU usage.