> On Apr 27, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> I’ll leave it to you what to do with this information. Rough >> estimation: nat may be +2% CPU with rate limiting, and +15% without… > > Huh, that is maybe a bit much for a default; I guess it's better to just > set the NAT flag as needed from sqm-scripts, then... True, also given the upstream sensitivity to CPU usage, we might not want to invite another argument by analogy, or an argumentum ad baculum… :)