From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E303B2A4 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:44:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z3so5549461wme.5 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:44:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=KGjmnp8YQbeAFKxKZnb2OIBbUM59Z68anhsMph/kjxQ=; b=aGLoAsTDDNdKcw4jNIq9GjsOgXrdfPaU5o7yVVGmwP21f1BAEP2VIAhgeHbxv5/pPS WvfRac9eOHmDPrgC4yy5RfFoEEmkE6rZNgmYa2aTFtr8XkB7A981jTzhkicNTuY1sYsH YsjMAkjCAolTEUFjDL4/u6qHEyHVSKjRpor5Ej6J6fqoJwtHfWHrkY8tX3ue4eh3c6X8 zWHbpCR/vwPFVvJoSIEA1Oo1ICSLFxGfF4ogsjvFb24FYWBU86wB27ijE4ClPlUgrJkg 7h8gr/LFLhc1rPXkvbT5X832yjN6BZjskQ0kDSXpf5NllJZ/Y8n78PIl/Q3543j+XUxR bi5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=KGjmnp8YQbeAFKxKZnb2OIBbUM59Z68anhsMph/kjxQ=; b=IZnrvBy9HVgKigSNaIOEkk70PIzv7xkXd2h++0IUGAIDYMY48+Ddvl6zeByGopsUTh zT3D3v9TiZBZsQjnVWWvEzifhv1l8mnE8HxZGGVEQg382nYTbMPkVL2oJcdjO8S1Vm5g V/BmM/nE7SrkeofYtzvp3s5ieAwIVjRejZeNkcwtyrb7SRoubwQWJjj337/fnxvK8HK5 j6cPsBZ2+awsokhvp81PibvtTwg0bQwTgwBnoj/uaXadqfIXdQtcrPArfkKep6oSfD22 6O1YK6oslxRY+2G0FlTgZNixRUq5YbXJwCZppqCclBEWmwF04c/R0aW7UTIBX1uysWMN GHQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX44spmlrp0xxasRHzx20t0tUu4y7nlFVjLBPLThXBJ6+pB15pl/ W7MGxpJipDwzN0Xby8LU6hg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMa6DGYH0fsvpGBOolDAZsVBv2Yji0Yk37HXl0FK2P735d8biE048JjrAK0fK4J/DMU3bhejsw== X-Received: by 10.28.157.7 with SMTP id g7mr10111726wme.99.1510778674123; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.72.0.130] (h-1169.lbcfree.net. [185.99.119.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h2sm18259742wrf.47.2017.11.15.12.44.33 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:44:33 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3B0CC9AF-1A88-4BF4-9672-B47AEAEAD0AB" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Pete Heist In-Reply-To: <87375f71h3.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:44:32 +0100 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-Id: <471AD4D9-4007-40BC-9115-821AFD342BA8@gmail.com> References: <87vaic8vv1.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> <87bmk372du.fsf_-_@nemesis.taht.net> <87375f71h3.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake upstream Planning X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:44:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_3B0CC9AF-1A88-4BF4-9672-B47AEAEAD0AB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > Dave Taht > writes: >=20 >>> TCP RTT ~=3D 8ms with default qdisc, throughput ~=3D 940 Mbit >>> TCP RTT ~=3D 4.5ms with =E2=80=98cake unlimited=E2=80=99, throughput = ~=3D 920 Mbit >>> TCP RTT ~=3D 1ms with =E2=80=98cake unlimited lan=E2=80=99, = throughput ~=3D 920 Mbit >=20 > This was with BQL in play? Monitoring BQL's behavior might help. >=20 > I'd also love to know an exact setting for the shaper as a close as > possible to the underlying bandwidth of ethernet. However, I tend to = be > plagued with Yes, with BQL (Intel I210 with igb driver on the APU2). An rrul_be test = with =E2=80=94socket-stats. --Apple-Mail=_3B0CC9AF-1A88-4BF4-9672-B47AEAEAD0AB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> = wrote:

Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> writes:

TCP RTT ~=3D 8ms with default qdisc, = throughput ~=3D 940 Mbit
TCP RTT ~=3D 4.5ms with =E2=80=98ca= ke unlimited=E2=80=99, throughput ~=3D 920 Mbit
TCP RTT ~=3D= 1ms with =E2=80=98cake unlimited lan=E2=80=99, throughput ~=3D 920 = Mbit

This was with BQL in play? Monitoring = BQL's behavior might help.

I'd also love to know an exact setting for the = shaper as a close as
possible to the underlying bandwidth of = ethernet. However, I tend to be
plagued with

Yes, with = BQL (Intel I210 with igb driver on the APU2). An rrul_be test with = =E2=80=94socket-stats.

= --Apple-Mail=_3B0CC9AF-1A88-4BF4-9672-B47AEAEAD0AB--