From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDED721F199 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from u-089-d061.biologie.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.89.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4o41-1agxHy0jHB-00z1Da; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:11:23 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <87twpaf0tq.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:11:22 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4B2F9D53-393D-44EC-8DC2-A59DFE0E6CBD@gmx.de> References: <87twpaf0tq.fsf@toke.dk> To: =?windows-1252?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fP9KTTjatUeGMrPe48StsdwNyf3vCarXZWegBSJeXIc5eB71NNd ZwROHU8j0zhKGq2Cg8OfwOTJs2oSy/ePISuQVvhgLDV00AnBmouo2OQdazuzUQthBLknEDP aWZyHnsY8wCVxopkQxI/FsNERLG3rsnSCjHiIA2PgUPHJYwI+Ul2nFqf5ZNosscXI63YEhW j6IcNDoNQ92dkemqhr2Yg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kwGZqHhjclU=:PqTqhjxS/y+yhA5BTP93AB by32yMxkvB86QjJi/HZjjfBHSkeQjyQmO63liPbo5j2Vkk48QjGEAIBCXXn6cx8nnba1XNgk6 nxjd65th1EDTeQGm+OoVndvvLd0sIbyYIKbxaA0/YKDsO1r1lyxyKhkgBMMmV4zBl4xaupFhV 6QHfa6RNNg+G5yjXlYgNANGgTsSwmWYF1HjSsfj6DWKoBD3tGE2A9u2NoPAy+CZ14j2TkeKPw buPyaK3srP62b3scdCP414l8tPdou5R58LOuDdExlpNCH0RfehMrbPwhbmE0O4hILkS3htth9 H7icu/m+38pQV1QO7BU/80IzQ5pv55ZZ5+uemhzk0VYmypKeNRzASPdyaK97J/i7/vIr1CJv+ +/cGDeBVVdbelRxEFDljkbrG6NkXbZ4MGUTwnAFudR3MvCIXjAP6xkJWY9Fm0XEOpEMO792Sw MFQooS9fejpmLchZUOZsvTVLHm6tqIRYfEIYU2LxnHGlIzqg7jK0F44M+ZigS2Ui4oRgpLtq2 /ypSqaDBorU1cXWVE+1CqHrVSZb7WD5AY5FkCYGqLBfnS79ECXHr61OzBJ6tUPzUwsv2LTMTr S7iPmsmdul/kEh+H9aXY6cpXiU3ESp11v5aNhTQTOFu4fGGxcOPnXM/WO587iPg0bnQn3LAEf W7usKy/u5OyKorCMIr6ChribIJNE2yFtiYCechsHnZ89DffWGQUGWWL1lYvcs03IdZK/Yi3/w oHV3KH/2f+DSb0KKjBh0b8jY9CTuF78J0RQF+PTpaZj5tOHqQBn9Ha/xSfL7+TCm1l9TaB26a ZExb4ga Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] memory X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:11:52 -0000 Hi Toke, On Oct 29, 2015, at 11:04 , Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: > Sebastian Moeller writes: >=20 >> This is all quite interesting and correct; the point I failed to = make >> clearly it seems, is that a 50MB limit on a 64MB router can not be = called sane >> or safe, no matter how you slice or dice it=85 It is one thing having = cake tell me >> that it thinks the limit I gave is to low to reach full throughput as = long as it >> accepts the given limit. >=20 > Well, a solution would be to not configure your 64-MB router with a > 100Mbit / 1000ms connection :) Fair enough ;) Let=92s get the soldering iron out and see = whether I can replace the phi with a 10Mbit one ;), mmmh, maybe I should = run 10BASE5 and do away with all that modernist =93hub=94 and =93switch=94= witch craft while I am at it Joking aside, I believe the issue only occurred on loooong RTTs so it = will only be a minor issue in real life, but still it would be nice if = cake would not introduce the possibility for remote parties to make my = router OOM/reboot ;). I might be odd, but I prefer a hit in throughput = to a forced reboot any day ;) Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > -Toke