From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] openwrt build with latest cake and other qdiscs
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:54:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502F3DE7-E5D3-4212-8116-D7EEEDFA69CE@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7OT3A8vdRZwfEd1+WpR9PiZeih-JM4bzH8TXCN_v9Stg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
On May 10, 2015, at 22:38 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wish we had a good way to monitor cpu usage over the course of a test like this.
I fully agree, I resort to ssh-ing into the router and run “top -d 1” on the shell to at least get some handle on the CPU use, to assess whether my poor wndr3700v2 runs out of steam? Just as an aside for lurkers on the list, the way to read the top output is looking at the idle percentage which should be > 0% (or looking at system user and sirq, as SIRQ typically is the highest, just looking at system and user will not give you the information you were looking for, if the question is can this router handle the offered load)
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> "cake" is the most current code. Please use that. I suspect you just ran into the hard bandwidth/QoS implementation in the older code.
>
> I had not got around to trying the "atm" option in cake, which tries to compensate for cell size also. So you should enable that - and I havent added support for it to sqm either!
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again
>
> I tested Dave's build of cake on wndr3800. (Didn't try specifying cake2/cake3; I'm guessing tc cake means cake3 on there). "atm" adjustment worked fine on my adsl. I can't distinguish it from sqm-scripts with the same configuration.
>
> SQM seems to win from having "overhead 40", which I can't configure in cake.
>
>
> up / kbit/s
>
> down / kbit/s
>
> overhead / bytes
>
> Median RRUL / ms
>
> SQM
>
> 16000
>
> 950
>
> 0
>
> 74
>
> Cake
>
> 17175
>
> 995
>
> 0
>
> 76
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cake
>
> 16000
>
> 950
>
> 0
>
> 74
>
> SQM
>
> 17175
>
> 995
>
> 40
>
> 70
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DSL sync rate
>
> 17619
>
> 1020
>
>
> 59
>
> IMO it wouldn't hurt for 'tc atm', 'tc adsl', and everything else to default to 'overhead 44'. (The highest overhead Seb reported; the original worst case overhead[1] plus a vlan header for IPTV).
>
> Alan
>
> [1] http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/tc-atm/#usage
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-10 14:02 Alan Jenkins
2015-05-10 17:29 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-05-10 20:37 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-10 20:38 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-11 6:54 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2015-05-10 21:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-10 22:19 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-11 6:50 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-11 7:01 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-13 6:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-14 9:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-14 10:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-14 10:33 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-05-14 10:42 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-14 10:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-14 13:12 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-14 14:57 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-14 15:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-14 18:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-14 22:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-15 2:27 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-15 21:49 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-14 9:50 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-05-18 0:49 ` [Cake] More overhead keywords Jonathan Morton
2015-05-18 7:27 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-18 8:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-18 8:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-18 19:41 ` David Lang
2015-05-18 19:57 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-19 10:14 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-05-23 0:30 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-23 2:27 ` Jonathan Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-05 8:50 [Cake] openwrt build with latest cake and other qdiscs Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502F3DE7-E5D3-4212-8116-D7EEEDFA69CE@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox