From: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Justin Beech <justinbeech@gmail.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Bloat] dslreports and inbound rate shaping
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 08:07:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555DF4C9.7050207@pollere.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BDE8792-3B33-4DD6-B662-C18B2CECD183@gmail.com>
On 5/21/15 9:21 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
>> On 19 May, 2015, at 22:17, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So I finished writing up my thoughts on bobbie,
>> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Bobbie
>>
>> which might work better than anything on the table in the face of
>> huge bursts like these, when the rate differential is so small.
>
> I wonder if there’s any profit in making fq_codel and cake behave
> more like a policer on ingress; that would be halfway to bobbie
> without writing a lot of new code.
>
> A reasonable test would be to try configuring fq_codel with interval
> = target = 5ms. If that works better, I could add similar
> functionality to cake.
I'm curious why you think that would be a "reasonable test".
Kathie
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
> _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 19:17 [Cake] " Dave Taht
2015-05-21 16:21 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-21 15:07 ` Kathleen Nichols [this message]
2015-05-21 15:26 ` [Cake] [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
2015-05-21 16:31 ` Kathleen Nichols
2015-05-21 16:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-22 3:41 ` Aaron Wood
2015-05-22 6:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-25 11:26 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555DF4C9.7050207@pollere.com \
--to=nichols@pollere.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=justinbeech@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox