On 18/11/15 11:57, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:
>
>> The jury hasn't even been assembled, let alone sat as to whether these
>> (potentially) increasing targets/intervals on 'slow' links is a good
>> thing(tm) or not.
> I think I was leaning towards 'no' last time around on this.
That may be, and my gut & head goes with 'no' as well.  Unfortunately I
failed spectacularly to produce a suitable test.  Also I got somewhat
fed up with recompiling, flashing, rebooting, copying modules with
different tweaks in them, testing again, forgetting where I was etc
etc.  To that end I'm working on a way to pass 'copy target', 'copy
interval' etc type flags so that with a simple tc command I can turn the
copying of parameters from tin[0] across...or not.

The task of producing a suitable test will still remain!