Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
To: <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] always or never peeling at unlimited speed?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:35:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5652F9EF.6090103@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw63NRZoZLZBsBXuCp7z9KXwsMp0bo9xRqiey6g71iV7kQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --]

On 20/11/15 12:27, Dave Taht wrote:
>         // FIXME: We always peel at unlimited speed
>         if (unlikely((len * max_t(u32, b->bulk_flow_count, 1U) >
>                       q->peel_threshold && skb_is_gso(skb)))) {
My initial gut reaction was 'never peel in unlimited mode' until I
thought about it a little more.  Unlimited is 'shaper off' rather than
my silly English language default of 'super fast, there's no limit'.  I
was reminded of my dream where an ADSL driver had BQL so cake could run
'unlimited' - and ADSL isn't 'super fast'.
> In either case we could perhaps do better with the rate estimator
> giving us a saner peel threshold???
Care is needed here.  A peel threshold of '0' is used as a flag that ATM
framing is in use and hence things are always peeled.  I'm curious as to
why a non zero overhead isn't also considered a reason to peel?
>
>
>
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake



[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4816 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-23 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-20 12:27 Dave Taht
2015-11-23 11:35 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5652F9EF.6090103@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
    --to=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox