From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008243CB35 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:52:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r125-v6so14005608lfe.2 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 02:52:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xEcg66dqzOs/KXA3u00l1HtMJmTYIQTY/Q52uRFnzJ0=; b=TyGgSpP2CVFkR3E1B4OARUoVn969RgZ+5IlQUiqMKixwhHUdVGYJW/ukY0Qt8LrO3G T2PyQb1Mc8xs2MByEHzJ7kD8kDvg1KL1whQplW4bNg9YhFV7yqt5K7V56mAMcoP7WZT0 MnjqFpbmdQbjH0pm59gWNn+Oqtq36q/oPvdU45VwVEXZg21m6hoAQdgYeFwy/B69Ph4V Nm1Zgf149rbWrsOgh3AoCKV6Vtm++N3qcrLO5O0C4Y/kENxBcloSd7ZCpzwF/3vTzeN6 62IDe926ANGxTYgMH7ShN5ZZlCzWF0RaI+tH1b4nMqohokUje6ikuuhHhIyBm8Ejfr40 roxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xEcg66dqzOs/KXA3u00l1HtMJmTYIQTY/Q52uRFnzJ0=; b=lMK/TC/S68eQhfd0OKUDarV0lKs1ZvTWBfudDab1DUYTp/4EZgDACbElyZHsOFvDDs nIYE+2bOUnosBv0w958Y2UXYqUY1503nfEF0t+GEmxQzAezPr7lXT8a8PgQKTJ9ePVnW /Js33xe2MA0k3Y+aI7nWq9Nqo+AEmNAcE+aDN1HpIc2UJmjpbU7cOIYq2V+cMZdLvLiJ XCs1Al7Qn7F77ksOiaEYBZQ300wbtATkYP+ewbyLmBJTo32dU6Yk7XF+0pS+NFemoKKf 4stbe3EO477oIs0SARpUpkOrE4I1H+/0rY0xtgp6Dt7q2cYy0AL+sum2R6cxQMnvv4Ci nW4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCREg/WOH6YC5VAGt/VW2BeQlQWAs8QmEnGHGXQ+9n4lmlDOXFd X5lZcFa0J+JQXSSZXGzuhyY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpl0XuNpcV9XdOGTL0wvDdli73NLC6UV9CP720zxcGHWeaXJfmeNptihxkdld6sdVid6WOiNw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:9c0d:: with SMTP id f13-v6mr8470477lfe.9.1524477122863; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 02:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.239.216] (83-245-234-255-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.234.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m18-v6sm2725958lfj.34.2018.04.23.02.52.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 02:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <87a7tv3r5z.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:52:00 +0300 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5DB5443D-043B-44EF-B075-6D3E62D27D7A@gmail.com> References: <87a7tv3r5z.fsf@toke.dk> To: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18) Subject: Re: [Cake] Testing variants of the MTU latency scaling X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:52:04 -0000 > Based on all this, I propose we change the scaling mechanism so that = it > is only active in egress mode, and change it from 4 MTUs to 2. I'll > merge Kevin's patch to do this unless someone complains loudly :) I suppose that makes enough sense. But let me look over the patch again = - there's probably a better way to do it. - Jonathan Morton