From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA89F3B2A4 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 08:47:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id k202so10353047lfe.1 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:47:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=l2inkWlZ23ilaA58o8HGhuZCRc1xoL2qZwhFeRAJ9YY=; b=AVafjFr9tZJxwalwaeEpH05wiOkNc1Ppp3J8MTG/R5h6q/99i/5+msSMrkWq4M3Xgb BQZLlhphSRlW5QMhtXHbB4/kGUcVS0s7M8EqAFvO0L/RCLin5LiVTaq38fyovAJFAzT1 aGRJKt246b0tRkljcS6y3GGQVCTgfa2NxQivtVWQQqelJvJdyOZ++uVtHwfS87wVmOzb CC623XQiU/arNoPEmSvOffeu103tOYArMWuSqc0uOY1xMs4sI5HRoSwdUVaZrbhiIIDp R7X+E/KxDfcoXCMDi/Gtea27Cz4r4+MpSZdjzPNqKbS67Ojrc2nMYImVlDrVHGUGVRwV dsLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=l2inkWlZ23ilaA58o8HGhuZCRc1xoL2qZwhFeRAJ9YY=; b=pUiW57v4z2W2jw0nS2tsfqhMSkkd/yw7WIk/LpEaG2lYGdWHb5kxpsVFReHWTMQTNk Nds4aSDzPedcUZrsA4p8VDOwrDSY3vqfL5OLxQDEK30rOI6s1jTBJQ4r+e9M9/ei4sBr wheCBD62TDv3tvhhZhyrXBBTMZrjlSwiOWbs+hcU8aSychKAA7WzjukNtLAyoakiDWUp czCnbLo/neqLgUHSg1UyTeQAInqKVqKXbQR7viJWe0GqCv0JMD8eveAOztrJQcWXxm6+ S2vGnotLoKg+atQzw+E4j8sJE9n7fUrzQkzop/X8CVfZRWQOP/xFiGC2J7YQIqujCP/H afRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lp6vZOjdgkC3CvW6ABm05rL9ER4J3hwqTOFMLQjyZzvxguTlIYt348RTTq5a/VPw== X-Received: by 10.46.88.29 with SMTP id m29mr2969073ljb.91.1488116874602; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.100.16] (37-219-206-78.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.219.206.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm9927251ljo.43.2017.02.26.05.47.53 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:47:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:47:52 +0200 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5E17AA80-FF83-4CEA-A1C8-BF12B0031CBD@gmail.com> References: To: Andy Furniss X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] Putting cake under dsmark on ingress ifb X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:47:55 -0000 > On 26 Feb, 2017, at 15:41, Andy Furniss wrote: >=20 > This works in the sense that I can now get tcpdump on a PC on the > lan to show incoming icmp with tos 0xb8. >=20 > So I try to add cake under dsmark ini the hope that it sees icmp as ef > but it doesn't, icmp goes to best effort. I suspect packets are queuing in cake first and only then going through = dsmark. What happens if you reverse the nesting? - Jonathan Morton