From: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] lockup with multiple cake instances on 3.16.7
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:25:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60A1337C-DE0E-43DE-B5CA-5815F615124D@heistp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2csj2uk.fsf@toke.dk>
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 3:53 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Well, the backtrace is definitely hanging on that lock in
> gnet_stats_start_copy_compat(). If it's not related to the CAKE logging,
> I guess it must be a bug in the upstream kernel; which we probably can't
> fix from the cake side anyway.
>
> I don't suppose you can reproduce this on a newer kernel?
So far it works fine on 3.10.107 (with mipsel EdgeOS build) and 4.9.0-8 amd64, haven’t tried anything in between, but…
printk tells me that it’s not locking up in cake_dump_class_stats, but after a failure in cake_dump_stats. When “tc qdisc” is run after adding the fifth cake instance, line 2974 is failing:
PUT_TSTAT_U32(TARGET_US,
ktime_to_us(ns_to_ktime(b->cparams.target)));
So the call to nla_put_u32 returns nonzero. Then it ends up at nla_put_failure where nla_nest_cancel is called. The function returns, but the lock is not being released by the kernel in the failure case. The following patch “fixes it”:
diff --git a/sch_cake.c b/sch_cake.c
index 3a26db0..ae3e16c 100644
--- a/sch_cake.c
+++ b/sch_cake.c
@@ -3010,6 +3010,7 @@ static int cake_dump_stats(struct Qdisc *sch, struct gnet_dump *d)
nla_put_failure:
nla_nest_cancel(d->skb, stats);
+ sch_tree_unlock(sch);
return -1;
}
Two questions:
1) Why is nla_put_u32 suddenly failing for TARGET_US after adding five cake instances?
2) Is calling sch_tree_unlock the right thing to do in the failure case, or am I working around a kernel bug, and doing something that would fail in other kernels?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 8:58 Pete Heist
2019-01-30 22:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-01-31 7:15 ` Pete Heist
2019-01-31 14:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-01-31 20:25 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2019-01-31 23:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-01-31 23:18 ` Pete Heist
2019-01-31 23:10 ` Pete Heist
2019-01-31 23:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-01-31 23:23 ` Pete Heist
2019-01-31 23:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60A1337C-DE0E-43DE-B5CA-5815F615124D@heistp.net \
--to=pete@heistp.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox