From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FDB21F304
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hms-beagle.lan ([134.2.89.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ltqb7-1ZQKJr3xfZ-011C87;
	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:59:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5eRMNAwba7UphtWrpH1hT_aKM9eDhATNAL3AV9-9iE4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:59:05 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <621729A8-E1F6-4AAD-AA99-C5B84B46E034@gmx.de>
References: <EFD9024A-2241-4271-A767-270A41703A5D@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw5eRMNAwba7UphtWrpH1hT_aKM9eDhATNAL3AV9-9iE4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:iuOQuoQDpp7wDjnVZePFaKvgUd40KpUEtNQeCDMj7wVqgDkzodA
	7w0LwxtFzLcIamf7nh7T3TxvOvOAqbjAvFs94lUzaWOob20WxYcxJsqpCgXBOa9l+FzBgjD
	YdQ4kPacROgmyTXvGJjLrQwbLmPJ06mC55hMpns0LkzYRPeiPQxW2eHnwOgLxGuKlXOF/rZ
	Qc5mZwUQuul5KFyalPuPg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] #17
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:59:41 -0000

Hi Dave, hi Jonathan,


>> On Sat Apr 11 19:33:59 PDT 2015, Dave That <dave.taht at gmail.com> =
wrote:
>> 17)  the atm compensation in cake is entirely untested. And it is
>> unclear as to how best handle pppoe.

	I wonder could cake use =
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=3Dskb_flow_dissect to get the =
inputs for the hash function? This function seems to dive into pppoe as =
well as GRE so should allow proper flow separation for a number of =
relevant encapsulations without the need to code this up again? (For all =
I know cake might already be using this ;) ) Thgis would be nice since =
then cake could easily run on a physical interface like ge00 in cerowrt =
and would not need to work on pppoe-ge00 (which is a pain as it comes =
and goes ;) )

Best Regards
	Sebastian=