From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] tc help question
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:30:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6618F93D-BB66-4D8D-B836-7197529474D0@gmx.de> (raw)
Dear friends of cake,
I just noticed that “tc qdisc add root cake help” gives, besides others, gives:
[ ptm | atm | noatm* ] [ overhead N | conservative | raw* ]
I believe with the new “overloaded" meaning of raw this is not really true anymore. I would humbly like to propose a new dedicated keyword pair to toggle the automatic kernel overhead de-accounting method explicitly. Alternatively could anybody explain why this is the sensible thing to do?
Best Regards
Sebastian
reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6618F93D-BB66-4D8D-B836-7197529474D0@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox