From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7FF93B29E for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 11:23:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 17:23:52 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1493997834; bh=ht6k/mS5tnOSrZgTZXIC+2r10bW+LQKs88qXvKHPnXg=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From:From; b=aZS/GdwHtK12U/K3a6uNuNPvQ/8KKb3NER9yg69HdmdTenLk+rNlYSrsbMGvrLvrM hZrHRMec15s2hqx/U46fL8o4oqMO1AxEUsCYTtOiglYCrUp1ZKA3PnEynf6pyl/o/V pFVy3d2OrwjkIH4gh8UdOHA3J3c27zm/rVa/heRnrxkWGJFZWM+LU69ToRkzf/RUSX bc0QCI/ueG59vTxC1ciFA2/e/DdGnOk9gVlYtRKgNbg5Ziq/xMO5qW8Wr7yo+jm7sJ M02hAOnurGzYHFstyNBoFqSfKnhBvqhcLAXlnyPXkHhBjRfjgy/6HEpduwc84b7MNG 2sCqWN2YlUyzg== In-Reply-To: <0F8A4A7F-2CD1-4DEF-99A9-1E14ECDA5D2D@telenor.com> References: <1493989225450.12354@telenor.com> <1493992526496.9641@telenor.com>, <87wp9vjtex.fsf@alrua-kau> <0F8A4A7F-2CD1-4DEF-99A9-1E14ECDA5D2D@telenor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: erik.taraldsen@telenor.com CC: moeller0@gmx.de,cake@lists.bufferbloat.net From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <661B553B-512D-4210-9CDF-0ADD1B21CE0C@toke.dk> Subject: Re: [Cake] ER-X now running cake, thanks for the help. :) X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 15:23:57 -0000 On 5 May 2017 16:30:38 GMT+02:00, erik=2Etaraldsen@telenor=2Ecom wrote: > >> Den 5=2E mai 2017 kl=2E 15=2E59 skrev Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen >: >>=20 >> How are you measuring latency in this case? > >I use nuttcp with the option -o=2E It uses system time on the two peers= =2E >Make sure they are recently synced to the same ntp server=2E And do an >uncongested test to establish actual network time distance, before the >actual congestion starts=2E=20 Right, so you're measuring the actual latency experienced by the UDP packe= ts in the unresponsive flow? Yeah, you'll get quite a bit of latency in tha= t case=2E But not sure that's a case we should be optimising for=2E=2E=2E -Toke