Re: [Cake] Thanks to Toke

Re: [Cake] Thanks to Toke

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:

> Thank you Toke for your continued and continuing efforts in submitting
> CAKE to upstream kernel land.  I am at least one person who greatly
> values and appreciates your time and efforts in doing so…. and
> wrangling the rest of us into ‘little’ tweaks here & there.

Thanks, much appreciated!

On that note, if someone could take a look at the changes to the ACK
filtering I just pushed, that would be awesome (running a test with it,
but would be good if someone else could sanity-check it).

-Toke

Re: [Cake] Thanks to Toke

[Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1085 bytes --]



> On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:06, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:
> 
>> Thank you Toke for your continued and continuing efforts in submitting
>> CAKE to upstream kernel land.  I am at least one person who greatly
>> values and appreciates your time and efforts in doing so…. and
>> wrangling the rest of us into ‘little’ tweaks here & there.
> 
> Thanks, much appreciated!
> 
> On that note, if someone could take a look at the changes to the ACK
> filtering I just pushed, that would be awesome (running a test with it,
> but would be good if someone else could sanity-check it).

Well I have it running based on commit 729c81a3be16cdd574935cc9de62ba1d5ce52fcf from last night with ack filtering enabled, not that my link’s 4:! up/down ratio really needs it :-)

I also unleashed my misbehaving ECN box on (qnap linux 4.2…goodness knows what bugs they’ve put in) to check nothing has dented cobalts ability to deal with unresponsive ECN flows.  All is good :-)



[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [Cake] Thanks to Toke

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

On 28 April 2018 10:48:17 CEST, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:06, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
>wrote:
>> 
>> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:
>> 
>>> Thank you Toke for your continued and continuing efforts in
>submitting
>>> CAKE to upstream kernel land.  I am at least one person who greatly
>>> values and appreciates your time and efforts in doing so…. and
>>> wrangling the rest of us into ‘little’ tweaks here & there.
>> 
>> Thanks, much appreciated!
>> 
>> On that note, if someone could take a look at the changes to the ACK
>> filtering I just pushed, that would be awesome (running a test with
>it,
>> but would be good if someone else could sanity-check it).
>
>Well I have it running based on commit
>729c81a3be16cdd574935cc9de62ba1d5ce52fcf from last night with ack
>filtering enabled, not that my link’s 4:! up/down ratio really needs it
>:-)

Does it actually filter any ACKs if you run a TCP download on a 6in4 connection? As Ryan pointed out, I think I may have broken that :P

-Toke

Re: [Cake] Thanks to Toke

[Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 457 bytes --]



> On 28 Apr 2018, at 10:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Does it actually filter any ACKs if you run a TCP download on a 6in4 connection? As Ryan pointed out, I think I may have broken that :P
> 
> -Toke

Sadly my 6in4 tunnel is deranged at the moment….irrespective of cake & ack filtering.  So something else for me to investigate.

Cheers,

Kevin D-B

012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775  9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]