From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nm25-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm25-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C9D3B260 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:10:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1477527052; bh=iw7ng316T24yLEa0nYtg7+Fnbg8p5yQ3rHy7ZKC+bkA=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=UZCCujkGAANYrfW52FWZVszAhE4qJrQwMINqiHt/0qV8Sx/nPnh4Hv9KWBA0QKtGcFuIT+366qpz1x1BfwH/vnNplGZWJXjhnEIjUtyGBBYuR8ySv1BqXC66MX6vbZwAEZR356m6y6Ini8P3lQhHUCosR/81Nz+7bLK89KaF4J+WsaIhTx5iJB+muIhOsKixQc0g+WJrTR3kQIdktVZ2eZnhqxtFV87Es61qm4dZ/YKt6XxZ8ayLvY6ODLvGXrA/De6JXgJMymlIv4W709nw8gxJoiKxBtV+s7NnjPmhCaBHFlFJN+klZG8fe+5UjHpm/1birKIsFcRMVuBCycNYxA== Received: from [98.138.100.102] by nm25.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2016 00:10:52 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.128] by tm101.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2016 00:10:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp215.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2016 00:10:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 918803.13752.bm@smtp215.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: FB4DhiwVM1kzSO1Er36Fr7msFsaXNc5S13fXrk7YdgsRNYc BotqcVJf_y0dnboepKy35JGBvo.XVqGBkld4CjX9jDjzEfojgIx9BZ77xDf3 Lkpk5Y87ZZ01dP3RGvTKy_5FE24llaiBxZKWBaY9GMVAfVUa14CzrdVTOH8b MkXheGpRF4ieGYk7njaMuJe2BLPGhYXCEw4XmotUJGoCb8c2azijfMcgYy86 ZN2NRba_pFxniqcU5zAj_brnnWQ3OneCrjBA54UyIropEWhNccBLfeVjzwar VRrCXNQibAangL_tDbFgbaDe2VsBhWwo_2AQ6IuPuVktiV6TJ78SK3KRYLG7 F4CIupqe8K7M40dENDlwEMN4Y79ECkq1atLxbe2dN8Vj4K2Ryo68Bxdr6uCE 12CqixhE2jNSXigFxNyfpK8dbL06DAd2SKfzHVz8KTyEVBOke4BFurjUPYQj L3iJWltP1Wu5hSiCGgapi.75K3Z9dYLFaKoO6e_Ip57EpB86l_7GJLdKW9Gk BZMVCi2JDp97Ew9AN3J_XWnYRFoNvQmBw8FGbQH5or.ikU1NPuzfZSyuMBa5 opLUMXLX0Wv2dT8K26.0R X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6sUo5IiswBDB2TZm6JKJ6DaI.Rsz4O0- User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----EK0Q86IXYCTLE21Q1RHUVUTT008JLX" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "G. Amanakis" Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:10:50 -0400 To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <758C5432-757C-4CFA-BA20-48F6B6D32839@yahoo.com> Subject: [Cake] WAN ingress rate with concurrent downloads X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:10:53 -0000 ------EK0Q86IXYCTLE21Q1RHUVUTT008JLX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I noticed that the ingress rate on the WAN interface as reported by bmon o= r bwm-ng does not reflect the setting in cake (on ifb ingress or on LAN egr= ess) when one of the hosts is using bittorrent or when there are more than = 3 concurrent downloads on a 3300kbit/s bandwidth (router behind cable modem= )=2E With 1-2 concurrent downloads (i=2Ee=2E connections) the ingress rate = reported on WAN matches the limit set in cake=2E The same thing happens wit= h HTB, TBF, or the police action=2E Any ideas why? Greetings, George On October 26, 2016 12:00:01 PM EDT, cake-request@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Ene= t wrote: >Send Cake mailing list submissions to > cake@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet/listinfo/cake >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > cake-request@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet > >You can reach the person managing the list at > cake-owner@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Cake digest=2E=2E=2E" > > >Today's Topics: > > 1=2E what if you don't need conntracking? (Dave Taht) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:19:25 -0700 >From: Dave Taht >To: cake@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet >Subject: [Cake] what if you don't need conntracking? >Message-ID: > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8 > >At least in my case I have several places where I don't use conntrack >(a firewall elsewhere) - does trying to use conntrack by default in >cake pull in the module? > >https://developers=2Esoundcloud=2Ecom/blog/shoot-yourself-in-the-foot-wit= h-iptables-and-kmod-auto-loading > >--=20 >Dave T=C3=A4ht >Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! >http://blog=2Ecerowrt=2Eorg > > >------------------------------ > >Subject: Digest Footer > >_______________________________________________ >Cake mailing list >Cake@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet >https://lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet/listinfo/cake > > >------------------------------ > >End of Cake Digest, Vol 19, Issue 27 >************************************ --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E ------EK0Q86IXYCTLE21Q1RHUVUTT008JLX Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,

I noticed that the ingress rate on the WAN interface as reported by bmon o= r bwm-ng does not reflect the setting in cake (on ifb ingress or on LAN egr= ess) when one of the hosts is using bittorrent or when there are more than = 3 concurrent downloads on a 3300kbit/s bandwidth (router behind cable modem= )=2E With 1-2 concurrent downloads (i=2Ee=2E connections) the ingress rate = reported on WAN matches the limit set in cake=2E The same thing happens wit= h HTB, TBF, or the police action=2E Any ideas why?

Greetings,
George

On October 26, 2016 12:00:01 PM E= DT, cake-request@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet wrote:
Send Cake mailing list submissions to
 cake@lis=
ts=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World=
 Wide Web, visit
 https://lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet/listinfo/cake
or, via em=
ail, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 cake-request@lists=
=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet

You can reach the person managing the list =
at
 cake-owner@lists=2Ebufferbloat=2Enet

When replying, ple=
ase edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents o=
f Cake digest=2E=2E=2E"


Today's Topics:

   1=2E=
 what if you don't need conntracking? (Dave Taht)



Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:19:25 -0700
From: =
Dave Taht <dave=2Etaht@gmail=2Ecom>
To: cake@lists=2Ebufferbloat=
=2Enet
Subject: [Cake] what if you don't need conntracking?
Messa=
ge-ID:
 <CAA93jw7mp-ht-vATvnSuq_6uSUJK=3Di_T_-br+pAMoHLpGM4aOA@mail=
=2Egmail=2Ecom>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8

At least in my case I have several places where I don't use conntrack
(a firewall elsewhere) - does trying to use conntrack by default in
=
cake pull in the module?

https://developers=2Esoundcloud=2Ecom/blog/shoot-yourself-in-the-foot-w=
ith-iptables-and-kmod-auto-loading

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E ------EK0Q86IXYCTLE21Q1RHUVUTT008JLX--