From: Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] 5ms target hurting tcp throughput tweakable?
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:16:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75e10bac-f982-655f-0ef6-483a36797479@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi, I am new to cake and just messing around currently.
I notice that on my setup with vdsl2 20mbit sync the default 5ms target
on best effort hurts netperf throughput a bit as latency to host rises.
My setup.
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 handle 1:0 root cake bandwidth 19690kbit raw
overhead 34 diffserv4
Where ppp0 is pppoe.
qdisc cake 1: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 19690Kbit diffserv4 triple-isolate
rtt 100.0ms noatm overhead 56 via-ethernet
Sent 3250414679 bytes 5976629 pkt (dropped 3404, overlimits 3402556
requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
memory used: 221952b of 4Mb
capacity estimate: 19690Kbit
Bulk Best Effort Video Voice
thresh 1230Kbit 19690Kbit 9845Kbit 4922Kbit
target 14.8ms 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms
interval 109.8ms 100.0ms 100.0ms 100.0ms
pk_delay 63us 9us 0us 146us
av_delay 7us 6us 0us 10us
sp_delay 4us 4us 0us 4us
pkts 1237775 4725460 0 16798
bytes 1781536029 1472719560 0 1224478
way_inds 11 43327 0 1
way_miss 14051 69600 0 3066
way_cols 0 0 0 0
drops 81 3323 0 0
marks 0 0 0 0
sp_flows 36 1 0 0
bk_flows 1 0 0 0
un_flows 0 0 0 0
max_len 1500 1500 0 1428
Testing to flent-eu.bufferbloat.net which is 50ms from me, putting
a single netperf upload into bulk gets up to 0.6 - 1mbit better throughput
that if it goes through best effort.
Trying a simulation on lan with netem and cake vs hfsc 100p fifo also
shows that latency doesn't need to rise much to start hurting netperf
throughput.
Is there any way or plans to allow users to relax slightly the target?
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-26 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-26 13:16 Andy Furniss [this message]
2017-02-26 13:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-26 14:34 ` Andy Furniss
2017-02-26 22:21 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-02-27 18:02 ` Andy Furniss
2017-02-27 18:13 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-02-27 19:26 ` Andy Furniss
2017-03-01 2:16 ` Benjamin Cronce
2017-03-01 22:48 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75e10bac-f982-655f-0ef6-483a36797479@gmail.com \
--to=adf.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox