From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06FE13B29E for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:19:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j90so22741613lfk.2 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 02:19:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/uD1H4ZgIPO3BpWi8kmSAW93qW60EHq+qu4EvgdYVo8=; b=UIR+HL/N5QqpGcRJGfDc4W6SMt4JFTjksQXRycSyz15mwyD7mqSlwEMGbbZ2cU4jp8 8+yAfByxunnWmDw5fNrk4RLmFoB1ErCH8l6HKNoR3zv4gkZSO+vrrXt9MavwHpclAX2S PKrlFHHcCAaaKM4rbADJdtVHhiKTVyeWdYmF0PNxqLWB+5pt7OMTl0Y0JqT8LxJ5gphU 5QV9nYic7UiaN4qOwQ7tZxAYdCH2FnM1Qb568DBF2l/z9uHV8oa0lnhDAPDO/Uvnidek Teq3XyGmsroIxOr3U4/DY/4sVjEkt9iTq9uTTTAs6H08Ayp1qL0oM1guA21MRUOXn6he /+HQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/uD1H4ZgIPO3BpWi8kmSAW93qW60EHq+qu4EvgdYVo8=; b=Uio1iVJvmGEHPD2tVi97ywfTMP/rMZJ39O8WXJAbIObIMKc3zxY+ED2U7ng4oSTl4C V95nJyb0uhKgZN0gQGwAoIRk+h9jvKQ0Jg6VtvkGz7nFocyEaqTYT9zhNF1OnIbjuUoj sn4E/r863tP5+vXa6V5H3gzlh/Dn//gjHZYp9KrHV1Mv+mhebCmtSo3YL3F7sLVf5qiO 3k7LYcPIWzzGCkygPwrpf2I6Cm2Tpt6xjGoIZKgxB08/yrr8BAc6SAt+iM1oegV9LMrL uSkXH6/lccR2FG1OViXm/MFP48d9XIcwJbqJjSAssJzNuI+yhDBXCJW4S0/d4l96Z5vk F8bA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0sKDhgetfIYDZzumpwzl50VaSM8D1ZPwX82thLOD1n0YmUPXuUNkN4GfnzIH0fow== X-Received: by 10.25.22.232 with SMTP id 101mr10775258lfw.133.1491470372843; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 02:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.14] (37-219-158-10.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.219.158.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t30sm205101ljd.39.2017.04.06.02.19.30 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 02:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <114d9b3b-52d5-9e10-4803-2f429fbc634d@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:19:29 +0300 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <817155E1-6CC4-4F45-AD7C-F64EB5933E25@gmail.com> References: <114d9b3b-52d5-9e10-4803-2f429fbc634d@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] Questions on Cake/cobalts experiment ingress mode X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 09:19:34 -0000 > On 6 Apr, 2017, at 12:17, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant = wrote: >=20 > Can I now apply two qdiscs to eth0 directly??? An ingress mode cake = and an egress mode cake? Or rather do I just need to tell my existing = IFB cake instance to run in 'ingress' mode. The latter. The fundamental limitation has not been removed (and is not = in Cake itself); this is just a modification to how dropped packets are = accounted for when the bottleneck is upstream of Cake. - Jonathan Morton