Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] why "triple-isolate"? Why not just "isolate?"
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:10:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8294DC0D-A8C0-4302-A86D-84811774EDA1@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw46t9vJGqeZHVh5Hat7k2fvSrjZs6c27jYYmHumdWmykw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dave,

Cake offers three relevant per-IP "isolation" options, dual-srchost, dual-dsthost, and triple-isolate. The dual options are relatively straightforward, they promise to separate by either SRC or DST up address of the packets, allowing easy prediction what they should do to a given set of flows between internal and external machines. They for example allow to set up either fairness by external IP addresses or what commonly seems to be wanted fairness by internal IP addresses. BUT to work correctly one needs to configure the correct directionality for ingress and egress. Triple-isolate promises to do something in-between per-internal-IP and per-internal-IP fairness making it possible to forego having to configure the right "direction" into the shaper. The goal making it easier for the user to get a reasonable, albeit not perfect, fairness guarantee is surely laudable; what I so far have not seen is a top level description what it does exactly and data showing that it DTRT.

Best Regards
        Sebastian 

On October 16, 2016 7:29:55 PM GMT+02:00, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>see thread:
>
>http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Cake-compiled-for-the-EdgeRouter-devices/m-p/1706441/highlight/false#M132430
>
>
>-- 
>Dave Täht
>Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
>http://blog.cerowrt.org
>_______________________________________________
>Cake mailing list
>Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake


      reply	other threads:[~2016-10-16 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-16 17:29 Dave Taht
2016-10-16 18:10 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8294DC0D-A8C0-4302-A86D-84811774EDA1@gmx.de \
    --to=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox