From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D2D21F5BF
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  3 Nov 2015 09:54:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1446573259; bh=atAeBpYH2jiP9n/muZyPkMJD8Ya7derGkK8eBw439sI=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=rNyNTWxG3bVIQqI+gVC7zyoTkeGzUFEFzHcE7YEGlgR+360CRK4MnOd34hinMvu4E
	GlXJXA+skD09012gXeboEteV13URF194PjgcRUfJBXc1nJ8OREP+tYDPW5s0e19hJB
	i2zAA14mAN7GpPN/V+3N2QqJMGQZVt2/fPy+DQSE=
Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A79D84E6F1A; Tue,  3 Nov 2015 18:54:18 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
References: <87pozspckj.fsf@toke.dk>
	<6A2609D9-7747-487B-9484-ECC69C50DE96@gmx.de>
	<CA077244-F5B4-4748-954B-9618BACAC90F@gmail.com>
	<874mh3pai9.fsf@toke.dk>
	<50C2A7B7-1B81-41E1-B534-CA449296FE77@gmail.com>
	<87a8qvc8tz.fsf@toke.dk> <328DEF4F-F149-42C5-920E-53D16DCF544C@gmx.de>
	<87si4natbf.fsf@toke.dk>
	<AE11FF8D-97A7-4145-981D-2201C7A719DE@gmail.com>
	<87fv0nasy5.fsf@toke.dk> <CAEA70D3-50CE-4620-96B3-B3C463087660@gmx.de>
	<878u6fas88.fsf@toke.dk> <64F71419-78F8-465F-B43E-D0F2CF08AB19@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 18:54:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: <64F71419-78F8-465F-B43E-D0F2CF08AB19@gmx.de> (Sebastian
	Moeller's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:52:51 +0100")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <8737wnarzp.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Long-RTT broken again
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:54:22 -0000

Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:

> Except, both are strongly correlated in practise, by virtue of each
> packet pinning a 2KB skb, I do not care too much if there is a
> constant factor required to get from packet limit to memory or not.
> What I really want is that halving the limit halves the memory demand
> ;).

Well, all other things being equal it would either way... :)

-Toke