From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Running Cake at long RTTs
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:50:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737wwmf1h.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6499FF74-D13B-4B2E-90E3-D1FDD3FD1468@gmx.de> (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:44:05 +0100")
Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:
>> - Turn the hard packet queue size into a lower bound rather than an
>> upper bound.
>
> This seems dangerous for low memory configurations?
Well, yeah, the max packet count allowed can be higher this way, but I
guess the only sane answer to that is "don't configure cake for 100Mbit
and 1s+ of latency if you don't have the memory to spare".
Having the (now lower) bound be a bit lower than it is currently may be
a good idea, but not sure what it should be... The current 10240 matches
fq_codel.
>> - Scale the target to be 1/16th of the interval.
>
> Codel theory claims 5-10%, so 1/20 to 1/10, so it seems you
> confirm the theory, not sure why cake did not do this as a
> default… rem, what actually was cake setting target to? Asked
> differently how sensitive to target being exactly 1/16th was the
> throughput?
Yup. 1/16th has the benefit of being implementable as a 4bit shift :)
Before, the target was hard-coded as 5 ms; so this was definitely an
oversight.
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 15:14 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-27 15:16 ` Loganaden Velvindron
[not found] ` <6499FF74-D13B-4B2E-90E3-D1FDD3FD1468@gmx.de>
2015-10-27 16:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2015-10-27 17:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-27 19:04 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-27 23:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-28 9:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-28 15:28 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-28 15:36 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-28 15:50 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-28 16:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-28 17:44 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-29 17:36 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-10-30 20:30 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-10-30 21:34 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8737wwmf1h.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox