Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:15:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lkhacli.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CE52664C-7F35-4299-A0E1-531F42A2B04A@gmail.com>

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:

>> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 6:24 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>> 
>> So, um, did we cram so many features into Cake that it no longer uses
>> less CPU? Can anyone confirm these results?
>
> To be sure about this, it seems wise to configure Cake to turn off as
> many of the new features as possible. That means selecting "besteffort
> flows nonat" mode at least.
>
> I forget whether simplest.qos correctly uses the built-in shaper with
> Cake, rather than just layering it with HTB as usual. If not, then of
> course Cake will use more CPU, and we should be grateful that it's by
> a relatively small margin (maybe 15%).

It is definitely using Cake as the shaper; in besteffort mode, but with
nat and triple-isolation enabled I think. I'll run another test tomorrow
with those disabled.

> There's also a minor complication in that Cake and fq_codel behave
> differently when handed superpackets. A fair comparison requires
> switching aggregation modes off for both of them.

I *think* offloads were turned off for those tests; but I'll double
check... Also would be nice to get a measure of the smoothness of the
shaper; will see if I can't extract that from a pcap file or
something...

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-11 15:24 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 15:41 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-11 17:15   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-04-11 17:23     ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-11 17:47       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 17:59         ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-11 18:55     ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-11 19:08       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 19:26       ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-11 19:30         ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-11 19:56           ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-12 10:48     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 16:03 ` Pete Heist
2018-04-11 17:16   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-14  4:48 ` There is cake qdisc manual Y

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874lkhacli.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox