From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97EC03B2A3
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:32:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307D87AF97;
 Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:32:32 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1487763152; bh=n6Fy6KbzNzLEZc5tWviqhUOoCCkNorMpMnaIEQViTdY=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=I2g2qx0W6WJh52jVG8L4RhKT/7QBsvVpRJVYuwZO6Eit4+hHZxyX3CObtqbneLHhL
 /1F1yWRbIiqZ5Yy7ME7kStZEYErNBwUjZrN1W71Nqu06Z3rSZl8Ei/r3wRIThRqmY+
 L+2JL9ZccNqpzRTIUWXGmb1cou5tH4sMjzTZNMG0yYj96BO4/cTr5sUd2ValP70ApJ
 lp+GAdkPLVGFszd7SNI0JUR0UUJaKYvVCtWQ12cbxVw04ucTEBwoxUGQqQ+MQElVdm
 FnohPGS7hE2XGdYkRLxd75jh0dgVq8xmo2j8g3/ll6zPwaRcdT6E3EZM+PTtIMvOzp
 n/q6xvy9Idxuw==
Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 6AC3AC40E0C; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:32:21 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>,  cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <FE6323FC-1A04-4FF7-AEE0-9364B9692AAC@gmail.com>
 <C0C72219-0930-405E-B943-517B2BCCEAC0@gmail.com>
 <ECA6D3B6-AAA1-47A3-9BCA-D2055F7C8307@gmail.com>
 <5B0FDEF9-6F7A-4222-8B73-C421066AB111@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:32:21 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5B0FDEF9-6F7A-4222-8B73-C421066AB111@gmail.com> (Jonathan
 Morton's message of "Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:24:59 +0200")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <874lzmfol6.fsf@alrua-kau>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] diffserv3 tin 2 target 50% of interval?
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:32:38 -0000

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:

>> On 22 Feb, 2017, at 13:12, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Ok, but for what it=E2=80=99s worth, so far I=E2=80=99m not seeing this =
confer any benefit as
>> far as latency is concerned. I will make full results available later, b=
ut for
>> now, here are two plots for the rrul test
>
> The RRUL test, when viewed in Flent, only shows the latency induced by on=
e flow
> (bulk) on another (ping). This is influenced mainly by the flow-isolation=
 and
> priority-queue mechanisms, not by AQM.

Flent in git will capture the TCP RTT (using ss) and plot that as well;
you can try that out and see if you can measure a difference :)

-Toke