From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4589F3B29D for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 08:37:22 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1708263440; bh=8beWY+QrDy6/+fh4tUHNOdrE7RoB91XHm/c7LPGud7k=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=GUbtvtS8v2m1TvO7hr0NrnicZY2D4P9ghIfW+pi7QCLfw1B3hKHGAJSUlYPMlANzY DvM2Gxik2XBEp7RdjHz0kEp7aEUOwhIfvQO750c3hprddn29gMv3PsWlZHV5tkaOpQ SvtvSn2FtdNS+Ym97x1QGm9ByaevP6y78ccQQVQUor0nerm4FMATMaAmUKwT1bbnJQ EflF2DXJVMn2fiIGvKZEX0az/ECl3QW43msDcSJ0JrJam8O4mlnAX3Yv27YvGvvXv3 2plgmdms06JiPegvMPmYBEMGu3+aRySJKXycaL4zp/ZQriLMR3qIoBKtOzXqJTxMs0 ERQutmhQj2i+g== To: Dave Taht , Cake List In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:37:19 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <875xyldhbk.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] cake's ack-filter vs GSO X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:37:22 -0000 Dave Taht via Cake writes: > It has been years since I looked at cake's code. > > Does anyone remember why we do not ack-filter a gso-split? Because a GSO packet cannot be a pure ACK, so it wouldn't be filtered anyway... -Toke