From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9E93B2A4 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:38:25 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1512077903; bh=e3lITzPnm9VmFK7w2zPiGWx/8PxuBo5a5pG1UzDFFIw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=t1iNgBU9qk+PrPpLddbjmg/plH/6BjRErlpofMMosXkHUdNNhK8ERgLb5oM1LHrKA sYXbriTSBugLbHRYXRJkp19P8VT15opLcx41itQ3LnUC1tdqZQ7NVzilE+uLKJYMmy GrS+Fat8IWRMrouKvnN+eK/cBFlJtFxfCp40RIvwTIolReseaDUlTc2kz9NSXjQ1x4 se3e9/PrPhjjuBTNQCRX5wTV2Vs3NLsn0fS4u5UJ/PTuD0GiDTglmr2vRY3MOzkts8 Lr5LkubAyUWYnTthezMlc2DllPNzV0B+ze/W9Nf+dxNr1m/tXxSlByAuML8ttPETuB J0YOWa1pgzHJA== To: Georgios Amanakis Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: <98B33089-BA99-40C2-8C25-B4568505AAC6@gmail.com> <87h8tb4gy9.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:38:22 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87609r4fch.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 3 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:38:25 -0000 Georgios Amanakis writes: > To correct myself, fping did not die prematurely, it was getting no > responses from the remote host because its p parameter was too short at > default for an RTT of 600ms. After looking at the source, I realized that > it is affected but the s parameter of flent, and changed that instead. Ah, gotcha. That makes sense. So fping will ignore replies that arrive after it sent the next packet? That's kinda odd... Does regular ping behave the same way? -Toke