From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] lan keyword affects host fairness
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87609zapmt.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tvxlvsex.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> writes:
> Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Nov 23, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is most likely an interaction of the AQM with Linux' scheduling
>> latency.
>>
>> At the 'lan' setting, the time comstants are similar in magnitude to the
>> delays induced by Linux itself, so congestion might be signalled
>> prematurely. The flows will then become sparse and total throughput reduced,
>> leaving little or no back-pressure for the fairness logic to work against.
>
> Agreed.
>
> man page add:
>
> At the 'lan' setting(1ms), the time constants are similar in magnitude
> to the jitter in the Linux kernel itself, so congestion might be
> signalled prematurely. The flows will then become sparse and total
> throughput reduced, leaving little or no back-pressure for the fairness
> logic to work against. Use the "metro" setting for local lans unless you
> have a custom kernel.
Erm, doesn't this make the 'lan' keyword pretty much useless? So why not
just remove it? Or redefine it to something that actually works? 3ms?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-24 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-23 9:21 Pete Heist
2017-11-23 9:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-23 10:25 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-23 17:03 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-24 11:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2017-11-24 12:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-24 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-11-24 13:49 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-24 19:41 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-24 19:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-24 20:24 ` Pete Heist
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE2eX4AJCPaBL-FW7Oj_afthXKnZn1RHQPH1VBCJfCyXDg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-24 20:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-25 7:18 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-24 20:03 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-24 20:40 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87609zapmt.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
--cc=peteheist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox