From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 884DC21F847 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 06:15:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1446819333; bh=2AJEeKPylSzFo9az/XHMxW23dBy0/7uGKslUIqIEg3w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=SuMruMDmcrTkBVTO5YKnrpjJOCP+XHvLIUIFIszDN3njCzndkY+569s/63XMN7Q+I ChpmIgC0rw0+LH4wvh1F/UvNPfaaS9RSb5XbYVirVYkDwj1OtC4YuPlYn6vOUwMGzb I9ccNNg5osyUuD8qdJUKa8AyhVyYzy8QDqUUV13c= Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF885C402DA; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:15:32 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Jonathan Morton References: <87pozspckj.fsf@toke.dk> <6A2609D9-7747-487B-9484-ECC69C50DE96@gmx.de> <874mh3pai9.fsf@toke.dk> <50C2A7B7-1B81-41E1-B534-CA449296FE77@gmail.com> <87ziysldij.fsf@toke.dk> <87vb9fl7ec.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:15:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87vb9fl7ec.fsf@toke.dk> ("Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B8rgensen=22's?= message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2015 12:00:27 +0100") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87611fkyd7.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] Long-RTT broken again X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:16:00 -0000 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen writes: >> I also get the impression that CUBIC=E2=80=99s RTT-insensitive behaviour= isn=E2=80=99t >> helping matters. I=E2=80=99d be interested to see how more traditional >> algorithms (Reno and Westwood+ in particular) cope with this >> situation. > > Can re-run with Reno. Added a run with Reno to the same directory. Smoother, but worse overall throughput. Will go do that Flent release now so you can actually load the files :) -Toke