From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5EC23B29E; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:51:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33F5621471; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 16:51:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:51:33 -0700 Message-ID: <877ehwn3l6.fsf@taht.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Cake] cookoo++ hash tables X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:51:47 -0000 Not that this is relevant to anything anybody else is thinking about (I'd like to speed up babeld's resend.c routines a lot), I thought that the paper and approach were interesting... and for a change... it came with source code! https://github.com/technicolor-research/cuckoopp