From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653953B29E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:45:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1524570357; bh=gTkhcHwMCbWKqyT/aUqbhfWKYbwY6L7bxfEH30QD1Zk=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=thAjdHBPCjGy+5mTTgCdYwmx4Bpde4f9dYep7TbezV11m3NwQXxmVZK0AzDbhnWom
 zjChWN58Ewm7+ZuQQDHIKXqS0zvVqNLrmNWgCFLUbB0v55pTqr8qZ4/1eIoP5RlD/y
 qyRa0kmcVyLUlYPykxkepiKnt3gRrSk/XSAPxMkNf+Xpkc8KQVlQ6DFHL72ZTNgJSa
 4HQdNS2mRw6TqHVs9znroRqAkAtY2ENh30v7eLj1e2GKWer+CNgV51T8nTjVGeI76/
 F4EPzL6I0abI/tmWBCiB5ysSyLDcn67vzqcA1xRzenwr15suB1bT6Z1wNJ7oGxm4Pt
 q0uoTzZyy2NHQ==
To: Jonas =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=A5rtensson?= <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>, Jonathan
 Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9iV=LKA7qwynzkhOmWXet1Wu=nNvbsfmE2Xw3AdOwmbY8d3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87a7tv3r5z.fsf@toke.dk>
 <FCA166BC-2EB1-4EA1-A9CF-4C4CE5A4D46E@gmail.com>
 <CAM9iV=LKA7qwynzkhOmWXet1Wu=nNvbsfmE2Xw3AdOwmbY8d3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:45:56 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <877eow96a3.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] Testing variants of the MTU latency scaling
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:45:58 -0000

Jonas M=C3=A5rtensson <martensson.jonas@gmail.com> writes:

> One thing that is still not clear to me from these results: if I run
> cake on an IFB without ingress mode (i.e. the default?), does the MTU
> scaling have any impact on TCP download throughput?

Odds are that not using ingress mode will make Cake lose control of the
bottleneck (that is what happened when I tried running a quick test),
and so will mess up both latency and throughput as you hit the bloated
upstream link buffer...

-Toke