From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] slightly negative deficits
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:59:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rz3l7o7.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw46yjqyDb3F3HuUDpnhu86cT-D22uuYBmR2gLFK8jTyEA@mail.gmail.com>
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
> I have sometimes thought that allowing the deficit to go negative
> (either one quantum or one mtu) might
> result in slightly better service times, or tcp, or aqm behavior,
> given tcp's requirement for two back to back packets
> to release an ack.
Why? Isn't that just equivalent to raising the quantum?
-Toke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 20:19 Dave Taht
2021-10-08 17:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rz3l7o7.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox