* [Cake] slightly negative deficits
@ 2021-10-07 20:19 Dave Taht
2021-10-08 17:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-10-07 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cake List
I have sometimes thought that allowing the deficit to go negative
(either one quantum or one mtu) might
result in slightly better service times, or tcp, or aqm behavior,
given tcp's requirement for two back to back packets
to release an ack.
similarly, scaling to 2 MTU at higher rates might reduce cpu load.
(sch_fq uses 2mtu)
--
Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cake] slightly negative deficits
2021-10-07 20:19 [Cake] slightly negative deficits Dave Taht
@ 2021-10-08 17:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2021-10-08 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht, Cake List
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
> I have sometimes thought that allowing the deficit to go negative
> (either one quantum or one mtu) might
> result in slightly better service times, or tcp, or aqm behavior,
> given tcp's requirement for two back to back packets
> to release an ack.
Why? Isn't that just equivalent to raising the quantum?
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-08 17:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-07 20:19 [Cake] slightly negative deficits Dave Taht
2021-10-08 17:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox