From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B42C3B2A4 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:04:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1568639099; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=txiAh+0As5a9z22oYJelYi0M355fCTmJqeBazBUTOxk=; b=LQMX4rd84nBjnd4R5aT1WAxgQwwiQTFTM2WqdhyvBJRsKlzLUHL57kjiastHuB/UO5nA8I f8s+yV0oHFPyi39cGA7u4Np1Ei8NzGGjYHKBjpKI08d+y0peXEOR13z7cQBzFW7alduFO8 EccW/OaOtkNQUM0NRaysJWGYdNZen+s= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-9-ydJ0kqBPPQ-sf7jOi9pGWQ-1; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:04:57 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id l11so18821737edv.8 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:04:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5TYoXR0WC07Xv2MveN+U0XekU4ypCZV1SViq5zwUBgs=; b=qv0aeHWH/c+0WjFrrrCWfZu4yT2YlrJkVpAlebtiKQn60mPoF5I3xaC/Le6AWRkDJf H+dqadDbinJPbpjQk2wOfuAcyWH13Ovp+qjNBmKRaBp1nlW1jYkMmaJfs++cs+6hpTbB toPOl0ql7IQvMYVsUs8FoajC+br0pUP/qaiVJnR2uz/XTQu5pEZIIPNzt/SEb06IIAbq KXL7xZU/U8691KBvLacFkAEkzULMt1xdf4bWdRt+EiC6CH2UY6yjI7cMnafcJsCTN924 Rh5ozwhsjUnEOVTc5BszjD4WzkGZluwmUQmWVhBw/rKQfBsR02j/Yb2DDsPutPgrUXXk Y+kQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUrsNYzaXjEqzpSZDmhZwGwlE6YSLm+Lvy1pDCvpqbh0C+z2wtr KKM4VuCa9WDNJdqn9vlaZOhETR6z6mn8AzPX10E/BSU22yz+1eYtmbFtIUtPPECK8hj1Ey252s9 0uuV4ds+u4/BVpHC4JU6TIA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:f9c7:: with SMTP id a7mr22418048edq.157.1568639096483; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:04:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjLmhYVeLUPYvXekjbVwKbNEbYnqRJE90C8EtaGTheXZDNECVBuycAcXd1lt/NozK1QPVbTA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:f9c7:: with SMTP id a7mr22418035edq.157.1568639096345; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (borgediget.toke.dk. [85.204.121.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rs25sm711633ejb.14.2019.09.16.06.04.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 953861800B9; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:08:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Gottschall , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <057ea708-6797-23f5-ef01-9d3d7b002578@newmedia-net.de> References: <2825CE14-2109-4580-A086-9701F4D3ADF0@gmail.com> <18b1c174-b88d-4664-9aa8-9c42925fc14c@www.fastmail.com> <9a90111b-2389-4dc6-8409-18c40f895540@www.fastmail.com> <43F02160-E691-4393-A0C0-8AB4AD962700@gmail.com> <057ea708-6797-23f5-ef01-9d3d7b002578@newmedia-net.de> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:08:47 +0200 Message-ID: <878sqomoj4.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: ydJ0kqBPPQ-sf7jOi9pGWQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] cake memory consumption X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:04:59 -0000 Sebastian Gottschall writes: > after we found out serious out of memory issues on smaller embedded=20 > devices (128 mb ram) we made some benchmarks with different schedulers > with the result that cake takes a serious amount of memory. we use the=20 > out of tree cake module and we use it class based since we have complex= =20 > methods of doing qos per interface, per mac addresse or even per=20 > ip/network. so its not just simple cake on a single interface solution.= =20 > we made some benchmarks with different schedulers. does anybody have a=20 > solution for making that better? > > HTB/FQ_CODEL -------=EF=83=A0 62M > HTB/SFQ -------=EF=83=A0 62M > HTB/PIE -------=EF=83=A0 62M > HTB/FQ_CODEL_FAST -------=EF=83=A0 67M > HTB/CAKE -------=EF=83=A0111M > > HFSC/FQ_CODEL_FAST -------=EF=83=A0 47M > HTB/PIE -------=EF=83=A0 49M > HTB/SFQ -------=EF=83=A0 50M > HFSC /FQ_CODEL -------=EF=83=A0 52M > HFSC/CAKE -------=EF=83=A0109M How are you measuring the memory usage, and what is your full config for each setup? :) -Toke