From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [PATCH net-next v3] Add Common Applications Kept Enhanced (cake) qdisc
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:22:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878t9b5n0q.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e27a6618-3a68-fa60-53a0-109b4df70482@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes:
> On 04/25/2018 06:42 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> sch_cake targets the home router use case and is intended to squeeze the
>> most bandwidth and latency out of even the slowest ISP links and routers,
>> while presenting an API simple enough that even an ISP can configure it.
>>
>
> * Support for ack filtering.
>
> Oh my god. Cake became a monster.
Haha, you either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become
the villain, I guess? ;)
We do realise there are lots of good reasons not to do ACK filtering;
but it does make a difference on highly asymmetrical links (see
http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/ack_filtering/), which sadly some people
are still behind.
> syzkaller will be very happy to trigger all kind of bugs in it.
Heh, right.
> Lack of any pskb_may_pull() is really concerning.
By this you mean "check that the packet is long enough to contain the
header we are looking for before trying to do ACK filtering", right?
> How ack filter deals with reorders ?
I think this will do the right thing?
/* new ack sequence must be greater
*/
if (thisconn &&
(ntohl(tcph_check->ack_seq) > ntohl(tcph->ack_seq)))
continue;
> Also the forced GSO segmentation looks wrong to me.
Wrong as in it's done wrong, or wrong as in you object to the whole
concept?
> This kills xmit_more gain we have when GSO is performed after
> qdisc dequeue before hitting device.
>
> This should be driven by a parameter really, some threshold on the skb size.
>
> What performance number do you get on a 10Gbit NIC for example ?
Single-flow throughput through 2 hops on a 40Gbit connection (with CAKE
in unlimited mode vs pfifo_fast on the router):
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to testbed-40g-2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 18840.40
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to testbed-40g-2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 24804.77
Note, however, that CAKE is explicitly targeted at home gateways, which
generally run at speed a few orders of magnitude slower than this, and
we have heavily optimised for lowest possible latency. So this is a
conscious design choice, I guess you could say.
> Also, how ack filter can suppress packets after skb_gso_segment() ?
Hmm, because pure ACKs are not generally aggregated (sorry, I'm not
quite clear on when exactly GSO will kick in)?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 13:42 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 13:42 ` [Cake] [PATCH ipruote2-next v4] Add support for cake qdisc Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 14:52 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v3] Add Common Applications Kept Enhanced (cake) qdisc Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 15:22 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-04-25 15:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 15:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 16:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 16:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 16:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-25 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 18:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 18:48 ` David Miller
2018-04-25 19:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 19:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 17:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-25 16:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 16:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 16:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 17:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-25 18:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-25 18:39 ` David Miller
2018-04-25 18:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-27 10:54 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878t9b5n0q.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox