Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 3

[Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>]

Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com> writes:

> I would like to point out what Pete said:
> in my setup the mbox shapes both uplink and downlink with cake, which is mostly
> untrue in the real world since the router has no control of the downlink.
>
> How can we simulate this better? 

I just answered this (for cmts, dslam, and wifi) in another part of one
of these these threads.

My brain is beginning to explode with the permutations...

There's one other basic topology change worth having in "veth version 2"
- setting up 4 servers at different RTTs. And what the heck, 4 clients.

I'm running a bunch of errands today, (inc getting a new box). My
original intent was to try to upstream cake tonight, but what the heck,
let's beat it up some more. :)

In particular, I was expecting the sfq results to degrade a LOT at
higher RTTs, but haven't looked.

>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Looks okay - but now with ack filtering?
>
>     - Jonathan Morton
>     
>
>     
>
> I am getting to that :) 
>
> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake