From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672BE3B2A4 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:32:21 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1512077539; bh=NnXnpkrSO3U4zuudvPLnfd4S9fJx94WksTy4ZUiTsw8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=U5vK4AzoUbsWvQj70Jx9B3uWIaW4b0fW/sRXoSMzw6yakCGlB66RKJYMVSD2FKFx/ C8ShtuPrNayJ9qnrRsjpP1UpMz/c8z15JiGsrNLVRO9sLeC3qyPw00gNSliZVc/33a ikZJtJCvL9NMAHslTgtA5HdhoWbxf9p+RvntNPieSlyITQkyIZfWODa0ywv1DvF/ft Sx68pbcuZrrCtk0AKJzmlwXz4WxbGW2up0LpRP7tnaTbZfbomoIK4gH7k5adkcQHFt DNbdqjR7mMOlXbqq8LaeEI4HQFh62BJzCD0cjlgU9YqvncLHC/a8aLwHGJekn4p8vK r6/s060vx8/Lg== To: Georgios Amanakis Cc: Jonathan Morton , Cake List In-Reply-To: References: <98B33089-BA99-40C2-8C25-B4568505AAC6@gmail.com> <87h8tb4gy9.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:32:17 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <878ten4fmm.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 3 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:32:21 -0000 Georgios Amanakis writes: > I still got results but did not trust them. > The error occurred at the end of the run. > > ===========8<=========== > NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload CS5 finished > NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload EF finished > TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) ICMP] finished Yeah, the watchdog timer is firing... > NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload BK finished > WARNING: Program exited non-zero. > Runner class: PingRunner > Command: /usr/bin/fping -D -p 200 -c 350 10.10.0.1 > Return code: 1 > Stdout: > Stderr: > 10.10.0.1 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 350/0/100% However, I'm not sure the 100% packet loss is because of that (but rather the reverse). Are you sure the other host is responding to pings? -Toke