From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave@taht.net>
Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EEA63B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nemesis.taht.net (unknown
 [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:2e0:4cff:fec1:1206])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F187621367;
 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:01:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
To: Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
 Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
References: <98B33089-BA99-40C2-8C25-B4568505AAC6@gmail.com>
 <CAJq5cE2QwM-S=f0UdDmbFhCxn5zh-NLv-wbZHH+xTPB9dP6OeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACvFP_gTBG_nE3F_CnU_9oGeUSpQWikvVqkQaQvQyQwyiF3S0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:01:26 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CACvFP_gTBG_nE3F_CnU_9oGeUSpQWikvVqkQaQvQyQwyiF3S0w@mail.gmail.com>
 (Georgios Amanakis's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:13:47 -0500")
Message-ID: <878tenwsqx.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 3
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:01:29 -0000

Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com> writes:

> I gave high RTT with high bandwidth a try:
> server -- delay -- mbox -- client
> netserver 300/300ms 45/900mbit flent

Neat.

An actual satellite link would be interesting to test against, as
whatever we are trying here beats against whatever they have already in
place.



>
> I had to run flent with "-s 0.61" in order to avoid errors with fping dying
> prematurely.
> Comparing noack, ack, and ack-aggressive, ack seems to give the highest download
> rates.
> Cake was setup with "rtt 600ms".
>
> George
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     High RTT with relatively high bandwidth is traditionally considered
>     challenging, and is representative of Australasian and satellite
>     connections. Definitely do some of those.
>
>     Low bandwidth should also be interesting. DSL at 4/1 Mbit is typical entry
>     level package here.
>
>     - Jonathan Morton
>     
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Cake mailing list
>     Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
>     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>     
>     
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake