From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave@taht.net>
Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29C63B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:49:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nemesis.taht.net (c-24-6-113-161.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [24.6.113.161])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9104D21474;
 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:49:56 +0000 (UTC)
From: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
To: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <mailman.7.1510506001.13084.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
 <F37EDD85-33CF-42FE-9F4F-48F7EC4F3D46@gmail.com>
 <87vaic8vv1.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
 <AD1146E7-2A5E-4009-A349-ECC220368E58@gmail.com>
 <87bmk372du.fsf_-_@nemesis.taht.net> <87375f71h3.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
 <471AD4D9-4007-40BC-9115-821AFD342BA8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:49:54 -0800
In-Reply-To: <471AD4D9-4007-40BC-9115-821AFD342BA8@gmail.com> (Pete Heist's
 message of "Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:44:32 +0100")
Message-ID: <878tf75kst.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake upstream Planning
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:49:58 -0000

Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> writes:

>     On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
>=20=20=20=20=20
>     Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> writes:
>=20=20=20=20=20
>                 TCP RTT ~=3D 8ms with default qdisc, throughput ~=3D 940 =
Mbit
>             TCP RTT ~=3D 4.5ms with =E2=80=98cake unlimited=E2=80=99, thr=
oughput ~=3D 920 Mbit
>             TCP RTT ~=3D 1ms with =E2=80=98cake unlimited lan=E2=80=99, t=
hroughput ~=3D 920 Mbit
>=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
>
>     This was with BQL in play? Monitoring BQL's behavior might help.
>=20=20=20=20=20
>     I'd also love to know an exact setting for the shaper as a close as
>     possible to the underlying bandwidth of ethernet. However, I tend to =
be
>     plagued with
>=20=20=20=20=20
>
> Yes, with BQL (Intel I210 with igb driver on the APU2). An rrul_be test w=
ith =E2=80=94
> socket-stats.

https://github.com/ffainelli/bqlmon was a tool for looking at bql more
directly.

I had forked it for some reason or another:

https://github.com/dtaht/bqlmon