From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8465D21F2C3
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  3 Nov 2015 09:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1446572952; bh=GBsv5CMdygsOwgYHsWur0ylNMIiwaT5DLup2DWpRNfU=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=d6aE6zvm7uHmWt6vl+QsWr0uubZO4EGUQRL545Fsfkwn0sOJJ+caq2ej3Naqve2Cp
	6m5T+d9BDXHd0mX4wdryBfNW0S71mQm16kQEce384TUs4fuZYOdiK3mzgLpey02+kR
	4vpVA3o8tHGgk8XEejW4EIGe+STihauuFFolZtxE=
Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AB00E4E6ED8; Tue,  3 Nov 2015 18:49:11 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
References: <87pozspckj.fsf@toke.dk>
	<6A2609D9-7747-487B-9484-ECC69C50DE96@gmx.de>
	<CA077244-F5B4-4748-954B-9618BACAC90F@gmail.com>
	<874mh3pai9.fsf@toke.dk>
	<50C2A7B7-1B81-41E1-B534-CA449296FE77@gmail.com>
	<87a8qvc8tz.fsf@toke.dk> <328DEF4F-F149-42C5-920E-53D16DCF544C@gmx.de>
	<87si4natbf.fsf@toke.dk>
	<AE11FF8D-97A7-4145-981D-2201C7A719DE@gmail.com>
	<87fv0nasy5.fsf@toke.dk> <CAEA70D3-50CE-4620-96B3-B3C463087660@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 18:49:11 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAEA70D3-50CE-4620-96B3-B3C463087660@gmx.de> (Sebastian
	Moeller's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:46:35 +0100")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <878u6fas88.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Long-RTT broken again
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:49:39 -0000

Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:

> I guess I have constantly been talking about a different limit than you,
> sorry. I was and still am advocating for the hard memory limit.

Well, if we add a 'limit' parameter that limits memory consumption
rather than queue space measured in packet size, then it will function
different than the same parameter of all other qdiscs. Hardly a good
idea, I'd say?

-Toke