From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jonas Köppeler" <j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de>,
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Cake] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Add cake_mq qdisc for using cake on mq devices
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:21:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a505b3dt.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.2e44851dd8b26@gmail.com>
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> writes:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Add a cake_mq qdisc which installs cake instances on each hardware
>> queue on a multi-queue device.
>>
>> This is just a copy of sch_mq that installs cake instead of the default
>> qdisc on each queue. Subsequent commits will add sharing of the config
>> between cake instances, as well as a multi-queue aware shaper algorithm.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> net/sched/sch_cake.c | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 213 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Is this code duplication unavoidable?
>
> Could the same be achieved by either
>
> extending the original sch_mq to have a variant that calls the
> custom cake_mq_change.
>
> Or avoid hanging the shared state off of parent mq entirely. Have the
> cake instances share it directly. E.g., where all but the instance on
> netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, 0) are opened in a special "shared" mode (a
> bit like SO_REUSEPORT sockets) and lookup the state from that
> instance.
We actually started out with something like that, but ended up with the
current variant for primarily UAPI reasons: Having the mq variant be a
separate named qdisc is simple and easy to understand ('cake' gets you
single-queue, 'cake_mq' gets you multi-queue).
I think having that variant live with the cake code makes sense. I
suppose we could reuse a couple of the mq callbacks by exporting them
and calling them from the cake code and avoid some duplication that way.
I can follow up with a patch to consolidate those if you think it is
worth it to do so?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-29 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-27 9:30 [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Factor out config variables into separate struct Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Add cake_mq qdisc for using cake on mq devices Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-29 2:08 ` [Cake] " Willem de Bruijn
2025-11-29 9:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-11-29 16:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-11-29 19:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Share config across cake_mq sub-qdiscs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net/sched: sch_cake: share shaper state across sub-instances of cake_mq Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 18:27 ` [Cake] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake Cong Wang
2025-11-27 19:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-28 17:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-28 22:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-29 2:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-29 9:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a505b3dt.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox