From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD7221F33B
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1443533240; bh=aSSu3Vl+U+sJcXxF+Nbt+kCD9RwhAI2zq3Xh+NDUvsU=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=nMfHxUF6SKZzestDZgtycqXuyVeWICErPXmro5fO0/m1oK2cZUtnFacGOOx4w/RyI
	fPALzZ8DYyrfr2nQc+0NyX128cqQGk6hPuTQoCq2A2IX7i479aZTnyTbBqh/ZENpB9
	Dqz06ZkXHwY4no/guGzUpJv+5szuiIhaHiC++P3E=
Sender: toke@toke.dk
Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B1634C402BA; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw4xUBVMBc6-u8LCuooVRibyZ_s7DQLwzaHDzNjRAk+UnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<560A8CE0.7040503@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87fv1xl63n.fsf@toke.dk>
	<CAA93jw6c6niwoSgYGvsrbUCG1JBNEU+wYJHMRO8XU+v1LfQnnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:27:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6c6niwoSgYGvsrbUCG1JBNEU+wYJHMRO8XU+v1LfQnnw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dave Taht's message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:24:42 -0700")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87bncll5jc.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] is there a patch for tc-adv somewhere for
	showing	active_flows
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:27:24 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> No it would be easiest to just submit a normal patch to iproute
> upstream, when the api is done. no muss, no fuss. But we are due for
> an api change.

Yes, except that this requires a stable ABI. Which we don't currently
have...

-Toke