Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Cake] Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cake: avoid separate allocation of struct cake_sched_config
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:54:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecns1n3f.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLdM=a=oagYA=LKbfaDuhQaYtxA0wNERuzNLGghA58Phw@mail.gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 3:32 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Paolo pointed out that we can avoid separately allocating struct
>> cake_sched_config even in the non-mq case, by embedding it into struct
>> cake_sched_data. This reduces the complexity of the logic that swaps the
>> pointers and frees the old value, at the cost of adding 56 bytes to the
>> latter. Since cake_sched_data is already almost 17k bytes, this seems
>> like a reasonable tradeoff.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> This is also fixing a panic, so :
>
> Fixes: bc0ce2bad36c ("net/sched: sch_cake: Factor out config variables
> into separate struct")
>
> For the record, a fix for the panic would be :

Ah yes, of course; thanks for noticing (and for the tag)!

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-13 14:31 [Cake] [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cake: avoid separate allocation of struct cake_sched_config Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-01-14  7:58 ` [Cake] " Eric Dumazet
2026-01-14 10:54   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-01-19 14:19 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ecns1n3f.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox