Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	syzbot+f63600d288bfb7057424@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cake] [PATCH net v2] sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:35:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frlshrnh.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109081811.01b7bad1@kernel.org>

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:08:14 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> >> I guess I should have mentioned in the commit message that this was
>> >> deliberate. Since it seems you'll be editing that anyway (cf the above),
>> >> how about adding a paragraph like:
>> >> 
>> >>  As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated
>> >>  into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the
>> >>  host load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a
>> >>  sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect
>> >>  of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow
>> >>  stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should
>> >>  not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth
>> >>  complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.  
>> >
>> > It's in Jakub's hands now, possibly he could prefer a repost to reduce
>> > the maintainer's overhead.  
>> 
>> Alright, sure, I'll respin :)
>
> Hold on, I'll do it :)

Crossed streams, but thanks! :)

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07 12:01 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-08 16:10 ` Dave Taht
2025-01-09 12:11 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-01-09 12:47   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-09 15:06     ` Paolo Abeni
2025-01-09 16:08       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-09 16:18         ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-09 16:35           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-01-09 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frlshrnh.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+f63600d288bfb7057424@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox