From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
syzbot+f63600d288bfb7057424@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cake] [PATCH net v2] sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:35:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frlshrnh.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109081811.01b7bad1@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:08:14 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> >> I guess I should have mentioned in the commit message that this was
>> >> deliberate. Since it seems you'll be editing that anyway (cf the above),
>> >> how about adding a paragraph like:
>> >>
>> >> As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated
>> >> into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the
>> >> host load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a
>> >> sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect
>> >> of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow
>> >> stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should
>> >> not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth
>> >> complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.
>> >
>> > It's in Jakub's hands now, possibly he could prefer a repost to reduce
>> > the maintainer's overhead.
>>
>> Alright, sure, I'll respin :)
>
> Hold on, I'll do it :)
Crossed streams, but thanks! :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 12:01 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-08 16:10 ` Dave Taht
2025-01-09 12:11 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-01-09 12:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-09 15:06 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-01-09 16:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-09 16:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-09 16:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-01-09 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frlshrnh.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+f63600d288bfb7057424@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox