From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC97E3BA8E for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 07:14:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1535973255; bh=bX8beySBrjFh+atBppi/+wJb32tXyAeyEVGzqQLZypQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ggWch+gMCBoe1VQIdLMHwR1pYB9ZLyZ5KPSNGhgj7hgWH4/A6ie10pump7OIj/FNM Fdr4pX+UmIB+Ktu8rxWSjfb2pcSGTkeBvHZSl6KtjwhwgUNRWM92+s3CuLZL+Hp/xR YADzBils9LkwsWfwantxoaDXw4PoqKRp071/J4g00FE/FYtxBglp8n0uGfXTlPVk9t WLh6kZHJ9HiDvhpV870IpZauD3aAPkAo1kyMR4O19ZyJwsbgHisZAtQnO2EfpfZ/4c rt7tgpB9tDzUU4lVU6GnF+C2W3vzMmXq5D1WiU6dMUjnWvMQs9wBIvHEXH0M/isbb/ /PdwnKZQ/CGDA== To: Jonathan Morton , Dave Taht Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:14:15 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87ftyq25q0.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] arp flow dissector X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 11:14:17 -0000 Jonathan Morton writes: >> On 2 Sep, 2018, at 10:37 pm, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Didn't know we had this now. >> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg413986.html > > Does that automagically give Cake an idea of the IP addresses > associated with the packet, for host-fairness purposes? If not, we > should fix that. Don't think so. There's a follow-up patch to enable the matching for cls_flower: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg413985.html However, in normal operation ARPs should be fairly rare, so adding this support to CAKE would mostly be to protect against flooding, wouldn't it? -Toke