From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D443B2A4 for ; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:40:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1527781215; bh=IX2n/4ich9F8bNG/3XYeWCOJK0uWHY7LDJIHF1tmNMc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OPf6Nm9ICE8FErCvvbwNWBK2l/EWPIBFI6Y1CDK59YsJcLoiIYzyvu1e4FwSBLvf+ uSZk6yXBjb1JtH0sDxjvrsILaGdoA/P8B0pdfMr8qB6M42+WBwbGxYhy4Rdfb6xTi7 ehZdRgmw+u509H7r9QI5HuYEkA3klEdMjiiMOBKXS+Xg+Uqj14F1lG8ZVW0XLjrvOh SNDNKFO3vc9VlcNEwH+2nl8adMfhd1Qoertdw1qxNwQwHiZ+Aukosvy19vh+0bhOka rQApFo4lGXVqC1dfndQWKASpSsBnGmaWkbWhq1m+chUIPHpqT+8dLAfuYNmfQDR/qa hVV43EI3TA/xw== To: Dave Taht , Cake List Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 17:40:14 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87fu27bzq9.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] cake at 3gbit X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 15:40:18 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > I DO have real 10GigE hardware now, but would love to see someone > trying cake at 40GigE+ in the real world now that it allows > superpackets and the api allows for more than 40Gbit to be specified. I have had no problem saturating a 40Gig link with Cake on it with TCP traffic. Even with the shaper enabled, I got pretty much to line rate, IIRC (hence the change switching the rate parameter to 64 bits). I just got some 100gig cards, so maybe there's a chance we can hit a bottleneck with those. I'll do a quick test run shot once I get them installed :) -Toke