From: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake] Current status and recommendations for APU2C*/ArcherC7 and ath10k platforms?
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:13:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fuh2s5r7.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tmupym3.fsf@alrua-karlstad> ("Toke \=\?utf-8\?Q\?H\=C3\=B8iland\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?-J\=C3\=B8rgensen\=22's\?\= message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:17:56 +0200")
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:
> Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Thought this might be a good place to ask a question or two abt the
>> wifi fast stuff... while Toke's listening.
>>
>> 1. What's the status of make wifi fast on the ath10k now, or did it
>> make it there yet?
>
> Well, the queue rework is in there, but only enabled for certain
> hardware. Not for the Archer, though...
I have had it running on the archer's ath10k, but we had so many other
bugs to deal with at the time that I haven't gone back to try it - most
o the time you are running out of cpu on the archer in the other direction.
>
>> 2. Is there any benefit or reason to use (or not) the optional Caldera
>> ath10k driver vs the standard one? (Possibly no MWFF connection)
>
> The caldera driver (and firmware) will do ad-hoc mode. Not sure what
> else is different...
Candelatech.
I have been running that firmware in adhoc mode for a few weeks now and
am about to try a field deployment of the ubnt uap-lites.
It is MUCH faster that 802.11n is at short distances, I'm about to try
1000 feet or so, through a whole lotta trees.
"Caldera" brings back nightmares.
> -Toke
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-21 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 21:13 Jon Pike
2017-04-20 21:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-04-21 5:13 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2017-04-20 22:05 ` Jon Pike
2017-05-09 2:27 ` Jon Pike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fuh2s5r7.fsf@nemesis.taht.net \
--to=dave@taht.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jonpike54@gmail.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox