From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEFB73B29E for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:13:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nemesis.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8501:df5:2e0:4cff:fec1:1206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ADE41F4C3; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 05:13:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Cc: Jon Pike , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <878tmupym3.fsf@alrua-karlstad> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:13:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <878tmupym3.fsf@alrua-karlstad> ("Toke \=\?utf-8\?Q\?H\=C3\=B8iland\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?-J\=C3\=B8rgensen\=22's\?\= message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:17:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87fuh2s5r7.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake] Current status and recommendations for APU2C*/ArcherC7 and ath10k platforms? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 05:13:04 -0000 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen writes: > Jon Pike writes: > >> Thought this might be a good place to ask a question or two abt the >> wifi fast stuff... while Toke's listening. >> >> 1. What's the status of make wifi fast on the ath10k now, or did it >> make it there yet? > > Well, the queue rework is in there, but only enabled for certain > hardware. Not for the Archer, though... I have had it running on the archer's ath10k, but we had so many other bugs to deal with at the time that I haven't gone back to try it - most o the time you are running out of cpu on the archer in the other direction. > >> 2. Is there any benefit or reason to use (or not) the optional Caldera >> ath10k driver vs the standard one? (Possibly no MWFF connection) > > The caldera driver (and firmware) will do ad-hoc mode. Not sure what > else is different... Candelatech. I have been running that firmware in adhoc mode for a few weeks now and am about to try a field deployment of the ubnt uap-lites. It is MUCH faster that 802.11n is at short distances, I'm about to try 1000 feet or so, through a whole lotta trees. "Caldera" brings back nightmares.=20 > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake