From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05EAC21F196 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:16:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1447931760; bh=XmthbWjSpIorX0KGBOYoXLIbsnRd4aUe5lkDPM1JpkI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=V6bscZ10vZpQKcL54We3Zbp/5wkgayKJDCmZmZiIa6RkT6+s0BG1KbLiaVZdxCBd7 HfFogpIwSjQsQ2IpGWO9u7wWK/woyac7n58+U2lLSWMXKgNnTYTdX00yRsouCHylxX LmgfXBdb5c93qWyNBUwfnb0CtOAFoVePMbS5dpz0= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3BAC8C402E2; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:15:59 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant References: <564DAE6D.1090203@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:15:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <564DAE6D.1090203@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:11:41 +0000") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87io4y8ck0.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] tc coding comments X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:16:25 -0000 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: > There's an obvious enhancement here too: Specify egress dscp code per > tin. I think that is opening a whole 'nother can of configuration complexity worms that we are better off steering clear of. Especially if they are to be implemented as regular tc options; we already have way too many of those. -Toke