Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07.txt
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:18:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1iwjkfl.fsf@taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154802074583.2126.8510228586201131940@ietfa.amsl.com> (internet-drafts@ietf.org's message of "Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:45:45 -0800")

internet-drafts@ietf.org writes:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : A Lower Effort Per-Hop Behavior (LE PHB)
>         Author          : Roland Bless
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 20
> 	Date            : 2019-01-20
>
> Abstract:
>    This document specifies properties and characteristics of a Lower
>    Effort (LE) per-hop behavior (PHB).  The primary objective of this LE
>    PHB is to protect best-effort (BE) traffic (packets forwarded with
>    the default PHB) from LE traffic in congestion situations, i.e., when
>    resources become scarce, best-effort traffic has precedence over LE
>    traffic and may preempt it.  Alternatively, packets forwarded by the
>    LE PHB can be associated with a scavenger service class, i.e., they
>    scavenge otherwise unused resources only.  There are numerous uses
>    for this PHB, e.g., for background traffic of low precedence, such as
>    bulk data transfers with low priority in time, non time-critical
>    backups, larger software updates, web search engines while gathering
>    information from web servers and so on.  This document recommends a
>    standard DSCP value for the LE PHB.  This specification obsoletes RFC
>    3662 and updates the DSCP recommended in RFC 4594 and RFC 8325 to use
>    the DSCP assigned in this specification.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

           reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <154802074583.2126.8510228586201131940@ietfa.amsl.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k1iwjkfl.fsf@taht.net \
    --to=dave@taht.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox