From: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07.txt
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:18:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1iwjkfl.fsf@taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154802074583.2126.8510228586201131940@ietfa.amsl.com> (internet-drafts@ietf.org's message of "Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:45:45 -0800")
internet-drafts@ietf.org writes:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : A Lower Effort Per-Hop Behavior (LE PHB)
> Author : Roland Bless
> Filename : draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07.txt
> Pages : 20
> Date : 2019-01-20
>
> Abstract:
> This document specifies properties and characteristics of a Lower
> Effort (LE) per-hop behavior (PHB). The primary objective of this LE
> PHB is to protect best-effort (BE) traffic (packets forwarded with
> the default PHB) from LE traffic in congestion situations, i.e., when
> resources become scarce, best-effort traffic has precedence over LE
> traffic and may preempt it. Alternatively, packets forwarded by the
> LE PHB can be associated with a scavenger service class, i.e., they
> scavenge otherwise unused resources only. There are numerous uses
> for this PHB, e.g., for background traffic of low precedence, such as
> bulk data transfers with low priority in time, non time-critical
> backups, larger software updates, web search engines while gathering
> information from web servers and so on. This document recommends a
> standard DSCP value for the LE PHB. This specification obsoletes RFC
> 3662 and updates the DSCP recommended in RFC 4594 and RFC 8325 to use
> the DSCP assigned in this specification.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-07
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <154802074583.2126.8510228586201131940@ietfa.amsl.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k1iwjkfl.fsf@taht.net \
--to=dave@taht.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox