From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539F63CB36
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:53:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1522252382; bh=B7JjwpDtOD4aNhfeY3sSWPEf2UZRU93dNU1JxO277yw=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=lxKH82DgkRxJa+Pde1M9EbIziDqfhc4MZEro8NCuFXExiHA5okQ0UkblIW2ENDXxi
 OLh3fLAic8LR6OJ8MyzvK/1yl2bEjHfFQ6braA7nmUgzbWN1pjMXJ96Cvnqtt6Vfo4
 BKeM52+jF1yHrXApvOBkRkg9wQARvdaiO6JRQqZNFBnq/X+bvxqN71MhpBPIX3VHCA
 TT2HX0gu8xV51ziE9gML/AVrKedO+wxHZ+IZhWMiJRemPcRw8npsnBVNn8mFQ9HK7q
 3ZlyJ46ohvAQ1pNe1rbfniV58KKWRiJxfhUkEwLQCnrinPEzIQPTXDI9Qss6hOj0Um
 q4Jdtp2WqsdhQ==
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>,
 Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.172.1522252010.3573.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
References: <mailman.172.1522252010.3573.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:53:01 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87k1twgpsy.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] bufferbloat still misunderstood & ignored
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:53:03 -0000

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:

> From: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
> Subject: bufferbloat still misunderstood & ignored
> To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:46:47 +0000
>
> http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/talktalk/t/4587923-sensible-discussion-w=
ith-talktalk-about-bufferbloat.html
>
> The thing that bothers me more than anything=E2=80=A6.. the first reply c=
omes
> from a staff member of =E2=80=98thinkbroadband=E2=80=99.

"Solution is two get two lines, so if a big download is using up one
they can do latency sensitive stuff on the other."

Lovely; an ISP that found a way to monetise bufferbloat... :/

-Toke